<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investizmo &#187; credit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investizmo.com/tag/credit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investizmo.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>World Wide Credit Crunch Easing &amp; What The Heck Is It Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/05/14/world-wide-credit-crunch-easing-what-the-heck-is-it-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/05/14/world-wide-credit-crunch-easing-what-the-heck-is-it-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iGuru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investizmo.com/index.php/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new Bloomberg survey, the world wide CreditCrunch™ appears to be slowly fading away. You might be wondering what the heck is this CreditCrunch? There has been a lot written on the subject, but not too much explained at a basic level. So here goes&#8230;.. The current issues with credit is that it has become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft" style="float: left; margin: 5px; border: 0px;" src="http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/23/14/23111423.jpg" alt="" width="195" height="250" />According to a new Bloomberg survey, the world wide CreditCrunch™ appears to be slowly <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=auSylFsVpRcQ&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">fading away</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You might be wondering what the heck is this CreditCrunch? There has been a lot written on the subject, but not too much explained at a basic level. So here goes&#8230;..</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The current issues with credit is that it has become more expensive. What does that mean? Well, essentially it means that the funding of lower credit investments have become more expensive. Why? Because people were afraid of risk and wanted only the safest investments. Treasury Bills (T-Bills).  <span id="more-78"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">T-Bills are government issued short term investing products (less than 1 year) that are virtually riskless as they are backed by the taxation power of the government. There is also a limited supply available to investors. So when everyone wanted these products, the price skyrocketted and the rate of return dropped like a rock.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now lets look at what happened to a lower credit investments. Lets use GICs or CDs (Cdn/US equivalents). Banks love to sell GICs and CDs. They provide great liquidity for loans and they are easy to sell to investors as they usually have some form of insurance. However, when less people want to invest in the product because they prefer T-Bills, banks have to compensate by offering higher rates, increasing the difference between the rate of return of a treasury bill and GIC/CD. Since they are offering a higher rate of return to investors, the bank will also have to demand a higher rate of interest from lenders.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But wait! You might be asking yourself: &#8220;If this is true, then why the heck are my GIC/CD rates been so crappy!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You have to understand that everything is relative. Look at the following sets of rates:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Set A: T-Bill Yield 2.2%  - GIC/CD Yield 3.00%    </li>
<li>Set B: T-Bill Yield 0.5% &#8211; GIC/CD Yield 1.7%</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Normally the market should function with Set A&#8217;s rates. During a credit crisis, we find the market spread, or the yield difference between T-Bills &amp; GIC/CDs has widened to almost double the prior amount. So even though your GIC/CD rate of return in Set B is lower than Set A, the premium interest you receive compared to a T-Bill has increased.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Did I make it simple enough for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/05/14/world-wide-credit-crunch-easing-what-the-heck-is-it-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABCP 101 Lesson 2 – Blame Game</title>
		<link>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/04/15/abcp-101-lesson-2-%e2%80%93-blame-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/04/15/abcp-101-lesson-2-%e2%80%93-blame-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iGuru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investizmo.com/index.php/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I wrote about the basics of Asset Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) and how the problem came to be. Today I’ll be focusing on who’s to blame in this mess.     Many investors are focusing their frustration on their brokers. Nobody calls their broker and asks to buy Random Trust #1, they have all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><img class="alignleft" style="float: left; margin: 5px; border: 0px;" src="http://mattaronson.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/finger_pointing_027.gif" alt="" width="133" height="70" /></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><a href="http://www.investizmo.com/index.php?p=10" target="_blank">Yesterday</a></span><span style="font-family: Verdana;">, I wrote about the basics of Asset Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) and how the problem came to be. Today I’ll be focusing on who’s to blame in this mess.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span id="more-17"></span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Many investors are focusing their frustration on their brokers. Nobody calls their broker and asks to buy Random Trust #1, they have all been sold to clients as good places to park cash and earn a little extra interest. So now that things have gone wrong, the broker becomes the immediate target. They sold the product.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">It would be the broker’s fault if they had sold clients ABCP out of good faith. If they took undue risk and pushed it as something it wasn’t. But they didn’t. These products were all rated highly by firms like <a href="http://www.dbrs.com/intnlweb/" target="_blank">DBRS</a>, whose sole purpose is to evaluate the credit rating and risk of products. If these firms would have done adequate work, there wouldn’t be a major problem.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.investizmo.com/2008/04/15/abcp-101-lesson-2-%e2%80%93-blame-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
