This will be a slow week on the economic front, as the only economic data out of Canada today is the release of data on the price of new homes in March. Prices rose 0.2% compared to a month earlier, matching economists’ expectations.

Year over year, new home prices are up 6.1%, a healthy number, although the market is appearing to slow down a bit as the increase this year is slightly lower than last year’s.

Overall this is good news. Continued strong sales in new homes will encourage developers to begin new projects, employing laborers and strengthening the economy. Eventually we’ll meet a point where we’d expect to see a decrease in sale prices as inventories of new homes pass the number of people looking to purchase them. This is normal in a market economy and there is no evidence to suggest the type of collapse that happened south of the border.

When I first got interested in markets I thought technical analysis was a great tool. It was easy to learn, made logical sense and most importantly, appeared to work.

I was fooled by this cunning, seductive mistress. Technical analysis is the fools gold of finance. It is an illusion that is as real as Michael Jackson’s face. But to quote Levar Burton’s Reading Rainbow: “You don’t have to take my word for it”. Read more

Forget techincal or fundamental analysis. Forget digging through earnings reports, crunching numbers on “trends”, or shooting darts at a list. The easiest way to make money in the market is insider trading. Unless of course, you get caught.

This probe is being carried out jointly by both the Securities and Exchange Commission in the USA and the Ontario Securities Commission in Canada. They allege that a US based law firm that advised on 11 merger transactions over the past two years had a connection to a Toronto business consultant who profited $1.1 million through purchasing shares in the target companies before the mergers were made public.

Insider trading probably happens a lot more than the regulators want us to believe. It’s just so easy. There are usually dozens if not hundreds of people who have access to information that can materially affect how a stock performs. All it takes is a quick phone call to a broker or accomplice and bingo-bango, profit!

OK, I know I made it sounds a lot simpler than it truly is. Having worked in the industry I know what compliance departments focus on and how red flags can appear on your account. I’m not about to start disclosing that for obvious reasons. What I will say is that for all the accounts that are caught, there’s a good chance many get through undetected. Those are the people who are smart enough to fool the system and keep their mouth shut.

A couple of quickies on Bell Canada Enterprises this morning:

-BCE Reported “steady” earrings for the first quarter. Net profit came in at 258M compared to 499M a year earlier. Adjusted EPS (earnings per share) at $0.57 actually topped Thomson’s analyst poll of $0.54. Translation: We took no risks and didn’t mess up.

1. -Investment Bank Genuity Capital is predicting the BCE takeover is will close. No surprises there as this has been the market’s view since the courts gave the bond holders the big heave ho. [via Seeking Alpha, CBC]

Not too many people pay attention to contrarians. They often remind me of the kids in school who ate paste. Sitting in a corner by themselves, ostrasized by their peers. Loners. What you forget is that these kids are often the ones who grow up to do great things. Their minds are complex and cavernous, sparkling with nuggets of information that every investor should pay attention to.

Contrarians are not the ones shouting from atop desks, playing silly sounds and acting like crazed lunatics when discussing the stock of the day. In fact, one could argue that a contrarian is the exact opposite of Jim Cramer. Read more

So much for that decoupling theory where Canada would not be affected as much as its American neighbors during this economic downturn. Canada posted a 0.2% negative growth GDP statistic for the month of February. Today, the US announced a small positive gain in GDP for their first quarter. Looks like the old adage that when the US economy sneezes, Canada catches a cold is true this time around.

All is not lost. This data reflects the state of the economy a couple of months ago, and the Bank of Canada has made a couple of big cuts since then. We’ll be keeping a close eye on Canada’s GDP to see if the trend continues, or if February was just a blip.

Rogers announced along with their quarterly earnings that they will be bringing the iPhone to Canada later this year after more than a year of speculation. Yippie? No.

The reason Rogers is so late to the iPhone game is that they run a monopoly on GSM (the cell technology the iPhone uses) and were able to play the waiting game until Apple would come to terms on an agreement. Apple has been very aggressive in its demands with other service providers and used the popularity of the device as leverage to get a cut o subscription revenues. I expect a similar deal was reached with Rogers, and the timing of this deal is rather curious.

There are rumors that a new version of the iPhone is going to be released in June. Don’t be surprised that as US consumers line up to get iPhone 2, Canadians are offered the old one as a substitute. Just be happy you have an iPhone, Rogers will say. 

Then there’s the monthly fees.

AT&T offers plans with unlimited data usage starting at $59.99. Rogers is nowhere near as competitive and it wouldn’t be unexpected if they don’t package the iPhone with a reasonable plan. They have no competition and no incentive to offer one.

So even though many Apple fans in Canada are jumping up and down with joy, don’t be surprised to be given a big ol’ smack to the head, courtesy of Rogers, when the details are announced.

After reading a heated discussion in a personal finance forum earlier this week, I thought it would be a great idea to write my thoughts on one of the most intensely debated and discussed issues in finance. This is a question that I ask MBA grads during 1st round interviews. You’d be surprised how often very smart people can sound very stupid when asked if markets are efficient, and what to do about it.

There are two basic schools of thought in regards to investing in the stock market. In one corner we have the active investor. She believes that markets are inherently inefficient. An inefficient market is one where prices do not accurately reflect the value of an asset at that point in time. Therefore, some stocks will be “cheap” and others “expensive”. The goal of the active investor is to purchase the “cheap” stocks and then sell when they match/exceed their true value.

On the flip side we have the passive investor. He believes that the market is efficient and all prices accurately portray the true value of an asset. There are no “cheap” stocks. Everything is priced to perfection for that point in time. Depending on how far the investor is on the passive scale, they either base purchases purely on future expectations, or opt for the ultimate in passive investing: indexing.

Which is the better approach? Read more

The chart on the left shows that rice prices are up. WAY WAY WAY UP. That’s more than 3X the price per tonne in the past few months.

Rice is the food staple of the world. More people eat rice than anything else. So when the price moves in such a material fashion, we should definitely be taking notice.

Rice, like oil, is used as an input for many goods (and we’re not just talking about Rice Krispies). With such a dramatic move, it won’t take long before prices for many products begin to move higher in tandem.

Crude oil prices are hovering close to $120/bbl, at record highs. With the low interest rates currently being pursued in North America, it is no longer a question of if we’ll see inflation, but how soon.

If we do begin to see inflation before the economy recovers, expect to hear a whole lot about Stagflation.

Here’s the good news: It looks like a bubble.  Not a quick shock like in the 70s, but a bubble. A bubble just like Tech in the 90s. A bubble just like Real Estate from the past few years. Bubbles can last for years, but eventually will pop and bring relief to an inflated market. The only concern is how long will we have to suffer, and at what cost?

Canada has long been a fiscally conservative nation. The strong banking sector has steered consumers in a responsible direction under their watchful risk averting eyes. There is no sub prime mess in Canada because the banks would never lend funds out to such high risk consumers. However, this Globe article has me starting to think otherwise.

I recently purchased purchased some property. At the bank I gave my income and financial info to the banker and their computer system spat out my maximum purchase price, which could be increased if necessary. They can increase the number by increasing the term of the mortgage. 25 years, which a generation ago was considered the max mortgage is now the standard. 30, 35 and 40 year mortgages are becoming more popular. One bank is even running billboards advertising a 0 down mortgage. With 0 down and 40 years of payments, almost anyone can afford a little place with today’s interest rates. But what about tomorrow? What happens if Joe with 0 down and 40 years to pay loses his job in 2 years? He’ll quickly discover that he has not built any equity because almost 100% of his payments for those 2 years were interest.

Joe will default.

The same goes for interest rates. If rates spike up, Joe might not be able to afford his payments.

The end result? Not a meltdown like the US, but a serious dent in the real estate market.